商业健康险创新药品目录支付实施管理准入协议的运行逻辑及启示

吕子萱, 徐志浩, 刘跃华, 谭佳龙, 王健

中国医疗保险 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3) : 102-107.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3) : 102-107. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.3.012
商保天地

商业健康险创新药品目录支付实施管理准入协议的运行逻辑及启示

  • 吕子萱, 徐志浩, 刘跃华, 谭佳龙, 王健
作者信息 +

The Operational Logic of MEAs for the Payment of the Commercial Health Insurance Innovative Drug Catalog and Its Implications

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在我国构建多层次医疗保障体系的背景下,商业健康保险创新药品目录(以下简称“商保创新药目录”)的落地,标志着商业健康险已深度参与高价值医疗资源配置。本文聚焦国际通行的管理准入协议(MEAs),系统梳理其基于财务(FBAs)与基于绩效(PBAs)的运行逻辑,并结合国际支付实践进行分析。针对当前我国商保面临的困境,本文旨在探索一套符合我国国情的商保管理准入路径,在维护医保基金安全与激励医药创新之间求取最大公约数,实现医疗保障的高质量发展。

Abstract

Against the backdrop of constructing a multi-layer healthcare security system in China, the implementation of the commercial health insurance innovative drug catalog signifies that commercial health insurance has become deeply involved in the allocation of high-value medical resources. This paper focuses on the internationally recognized Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs), systematically reviewing the operational logic of Finance-Based Agreements (FBAs) and Performance-Based Agreements (PBAs), and analyzing them in conjunction with international payment practices. Addressing the current dilemmas faced by China's commercial insurance, this study aims to explore a managed entry pathway tailored to the Chinese context. The goal is to find the greatest common divisor between maintaining fund security and incentivizing pharmaceutical innovation, thereby achieving high-quality development of healthcare security.

关键词

商业健康险 / 创新药目录 / 管理准入协议

Key words

commercial health insurance / innovative drug catalog / managed entry agreements

引用本文

导出引用
吕子萱, 徐志浩, 刘跃华, 谭佳龙, 王健. 商业健康险创新药品目录支付实施管理准入协议的运行逻辑及启示[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2026, 0(3): 102-107 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.3.012
The Operational Logic of MEAs for the Payment of the Commercial Health Insurance Innovative Drug Catalog and Its Implications[J]. China Health Insurance. 2026, 0(3): 102-107 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.3.012
中图分类号: F840.684 C913.7   

参考文献

[1] MOREL T, ARICKX F, BEFRITS G, et al.Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries[J]. Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2013, 8(1): 198.
[2] World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Access to new medicines in Europe: technical review of policy initiatives and opportunities for collaboration and research [R]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015.
[3] FERRARIO A, KANAVOS P.Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience [R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2013.
[4] OECD. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states: how they work and possible future priorities [R]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
[5] French Republic. Law No.2014-1554 of December 22, 2014 on Social Security Financing for 2015 [EB/OL]. (2014-12-23) [2025-12-27]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000029953502.
[6] MOON S, ERICKSON E.Universal medicine access through lump-sum remuneration—Australia' s approach to hepatitis C[J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 380(7): 607-610.
[7] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma in people who have received at least one prior therapy (TA171) [EB/OL]. (2009-06-24) [2025-12-27]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta171.
[8] SEELEY E, KESSELHEIM A S.Outcomes-based pharmaceutical contracts: an answer to high US drug spending[J]. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund), 2017: 1-8.
[9] 国联证券. 我国商业健康险发展现状及海外经验[R].无锡:国联证券股份有限公司,2025.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/