以过度医疗实施医保骗保的刑法规制问题研究

刘璟锟

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 79-86.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 79-86. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.009
观察思考

以过度医疗实施医保骗保的刑法规制问题研究

  • 刘璟锟
作者信息 +

Research on the Criminal Regulation of Medical Insurance Fraud by Excessive Medical Treatment

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

医保骗保行为目前受到行政法和刑法的规制,在社会危害性达到一定程度时以诈骗罪定罪处罚。过度医疗是实施骗保的手段之一,但目前刑事领域的规范性法律文件并未对该行为作出明文规定,对“过度”的判断标准和刑事责任罚金的裁量基准也有待补充。医保骗保行为的刑法规制应当基于过度医疗行为的法益侵害性和骗保行为相较于其他诈骗犯罪的特殊性进行完善。一是加强对过度医疗行为的规制,从源头遏制以过度医疗实施骗保的行为。从立法上明确“过度”的判断标准,增设医保骗保相关罪名。二是完善医保骗保行为定罪处罚规则。对兜底条款进行目的解释和适当限缩,对以过度医疗实施骗保的行为在侵害生命健康法益的情况下,适用数罪并罚规则。三是细化罚金的裁量基准。针对不同行为的危害程度分别设定不同的罚金区间。通过完善刑事立法中有关医保骗保行为的判断标准和裁量基准,完善对以过度医疗实施医保骗保的刑法规制。

Abstract

Currently, medical insurance fraud behavior is regulated by administrative law and criminal law. When the social harmfulness reaches a certain level, it will be convicted and punished as the crime of fraud. Excessive diagnosis and treatment is one of the means to carry out medical insurance fraud, but it has not been explicitly stipulated in the regulatory legal documents in the criminal field at present. Moreover, the judgment standard for "excessive" and the discretion benchmark for criminal liability fines also need to be supplemented. The criminal regulation of medical insurance fraud behavior should be improved based on the infringement of legal interests by excessive medical treatment and the particularity of medical insurance fraud behavior compared with other fraud crimes. First, the regulation of excessive medical treatment should be strengthened to prevent insurance fraud by excessive medical treatment behavior from the source. The judgment standard for "excessive" should be clearly defined in legislation, and relevant crimes related to medical insurance fraud can also be added. Second, the rules for conviction and punishment of medical insurance fraud behavior should be improved. The general clause should be interpreted in light of its purpose and restricted. When the insurance fraud behavior committed by excessive medical treatment infringes on the interests of life and health, the rule of combined punishment for several crimes should be applied. Third, the discretion benchmark for fines should be refined. Different fine ranges should be set according to the degree of harm of different behaviors. By improving the judgment standards and discretion benchmarks of medical insurance fraud behavior in criminal legislation, it is conducive to realizing the criminal regulation of medical insurance fraud committed through excessive medical treatment.

关键词

过度医疗 / 医保骗保 / 医疗保障基金 / 定点医药机构

Key words

excessive diagnosis and treatment / medical insurance fraud / healthcare security fund / designated medical and pharmaceutical institutions

引用本文

导出引用
刘璟锟. 以过度医疗实施医保骗保的刑法规制问题研究[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(8): 79-86 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.009
Research on the Criminal Regulation of Medical Insurance Fraud by Excessive Medical Treatment[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(8): 79-86 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.009
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 梅帅,秦国文.全国首例过度医疗民事公益诉讼案件办理之参考[J].中国检察官,2025(06):52-56.
[2] 陈真波,杜涛.民营医院医保骗保行为侦查打击研究[J].贵州警察学院学报,2025,37(03):64-70.
[3] 张子健. 异地就医医保基金协同监管机制研究[J].中国医疗保险,2025(04):75-81.
[4] 徐文雅,徐美瑾,段玉玉.南京G医院医保骗保行为的风险防控[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2020, 31(03):337-339.
[5] 刘孟嘉,张金穗,陈文,等.定点医疗机构信用管理在医保基金监管中的重要性与实现策略[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(11):32-36.
[6] 李芬静. 过度医疗的刑法规制研究[J].中国卫生法制,2022,30(01):74-80.
[7] 张明楷.刑法学(第5版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:1000.
[8] 张明楷. 诈骗罪与金融诈骗罪研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006:7.
[9] 周子力,王可欣,张鑫,等.医疗保险欺诈的典型形式与监管措施研究——基于国家医疗保障局公开的179起骗保典型案例研究[J].卫生软科学,2025,39(02):73-78.
[10] 刘汴鹤. 医保骗保行为的刑法适用问题研究[J].医学与法学,2023,15(04):9-20.
[11] 李锋,闫道举.医患合谋骗保案例分析及治理对策[J].中国医疗保险,2014(03):44-47.
[12] 韦树盛,李淑雯.定点医疗机构的骗保行为及其防范措施[J].经济师,2023(08):230-232.
[13] 王安富,黄敏,李连宏.论过度性医疗、保护性医疗与防御性医疗的法律界定[J].医学与哲学(A),2013,34(05):67-69.
[14] 刘嘉豪,李萌,夏轩.我国药品集中采购制度的法律检视与完善路径——兼论《医疗保障法(征求意见稿)》中的相关内容[J].中国价格监管与反垄断,2023(06):30-35.
[15] 颜培哲,张则敏,李沣航,等.医保基金监管信用体系建设试点工作现况研究[J].中国卫生经济,2023,42(10):19-22.
[16] 徐冠军,蔡呈曦.医保违规案件处理的现状与对策建议——基于各地案情通报的分析与研究[J].中国医疗保险,2020(10):30-34.
[17] 李西霞. 完善我国反欺诈骗取医保基金刑事法律规定的思考[J].中国医疗保险,2019(05):20-23.
[18] 陈鸿翔,陈学勇,付想兵.《关于办理医保骗保刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》的理解与适用[J].人民司法,2024(19):26-31.
[19] 李晓堰. 过度医疗责任构成及其归责原则[J].医学与法学,2012,4(04):28-30.
[20] 约翰·科根,基思·赛雷特,A.M.维安作,等.公共卫生法:伦理、治理与规制[M].南京:译林出版社,2021:190-193.
[21] 刘璟锟. 诊疗活动判断标准法律问题研究[J].现代医学,2024,52(S1):228-234.
[22] 张文英,曾小燕.医药反腐背景下医药机构医保诈骗犯罪实证研究[J].卫生法学,2024,32(05):41-46.
[23] 李泽华,孟彦辰.我国医疗保险欺诈的典型形式与防范机制研究——基于国家医疗保障局公开的24起骗保典型案例研究[J].中国卫生法制,2021,29(05):17-20.
[24] 邹浩. 医疗反腐背景下定点医药机构欺诈骗保的责任追究研究[J].医学与法学,2024,16(02):47-55.
[25] 曹红虹,周颖,李轩. “两高一部”《关于办理医保骗保刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》的理解与适用[J].人民检察,2024(17):24-31.
[26] 顾梅,赵宁,李进,等.我国门诊医保支付方式改革的实践探索和启示[J].中国医院管理,2025,45(04):30-34.
[27] “社会保险法实施评估”课题组,郑功成,鲁全,等.中国社会保险制度:改革实践、路径偏差与制度优化—— 《中华人民共和国社会保险法》实施评估报告[J].社会保障评论,2024,8(05):3-42.
[28] 闫硕.医疗保障法草案首次亮相全民医保制度步入法治化轨道[N].21世纪经济报道,2025-06-25(001).

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/