第三人侵权纠纷中医保基金先行支付的困境与出路——基于法理与实践的双重考察

南之湄

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 53-59.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 53-59. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.006
观察思考

第三人侵权纠纷中医保基金先行支付的困境与出路——基于法理与实践的双重考察

  • 南之湄
作者信息 +

Difficulties and Solutions Regarding Advance Payment by Basic Medical Insurance Funds in Third-Party Infringement Disputes——A Dual Examination Based on Legal Principles and Practice

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基本医疗保险覆盖面不断扩大,其在保护居民健康权益方面的重要性日益凸显,医保基金先行支付能够有效减轻参保人经济负担。然而,由于医保基金先行支付同时牵系着参保人自身利益与医保基金安全,在先行支付与追偿两大环节中都面临着一系列阻碍,主要体现在参保人先行支付申请困难与医保经办机构追偿困难两方面。本研究通过分析制度法理、剖析实践难题、借鉴国外经验,探索实体规则与程序机制优化的双重路径,以期为更好地保障医疗保险基金稳健运行提供有益参考。

Abstract

The coverage of basic medical insurance has been continuously expanding, and its importance in safeguarding residents' health rights and interests has become increasingly prominent. The advance payment of basic medical insurance funds can effectively alleviate the financial burden of insured individuals. However, due to the simultaneous involvement of insured individuals' interests and the safety of medical insurance funds, this system faces a series of obstacles in both the advance payment and subrogation processes. These obstacles are mainly reflected in the difficulties faced by insured individuals in applying for advance payment and by medical insurance agencies in subrogation. This study explores dual paths for optimizing substantive rules and procedural mechanisms by analyzing the legal principles of the system, dissecting practical challenges, and drawing on foreign experience, to provide useful references for better ensuring the stable operation of basic medical insurance funds.

关键词

医保基金 / 先行支付 / 代位求偿 / 第三人侵权

Key words

medical insurance fund / advance payment / subrogation claim / third-party infringement

引用本文

导出引用
南之湄. 第三人侵权纠纷中医保基金先行支付的困境与出路——基于法理与实践的双重考察[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(8): 53-59 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.006
Difficulties and Solutions Regarding Advance Payment by Basic Medical Insurance Funds in Third-Party Infringement Disputes——A Dual Examination Based on Legal Principles and Practice[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(8): 53-59 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.006
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 博登海默. 法理学——法哲学及其方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987.
[2] 夏磊,丁丽.第三人侵权时医保基金先行支付相关问题探究[J].现代医学,2023,51(S1):56-61.
[3] 张圣斌,王倩.侵权引发的基本医疗行政给付追偿路径探析——以信息不对称理论为视角[C]//审判体系和审判能力现代化与行政法律适用问题研究——全国法院第32届学术讨论会获奖论文集(下).江苏省无锡市中级人民法院,2021:538-549.
[4] 吴为民. 医保基金代位求偿制度的法理探讨与完善建议——以交通事故第三人侵权案件为例[J].中国医疗保险,2023(12):72-76.
[5] 杨锦刚. 医保基金先行支付与追偿途径的思考[J].四川劳动保障,2019(08):25.
[6] 汪棋佩. 第三人侵权与医保报销的行民交叉问题探究[J].中国公共法律服务,2024(03):180-190.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/