医疗机构与长护机构服务内容和价格对比研究

王思彤, 刘昭, 张帆, 段承阿鑫, 艾丹丹, 张旭, 赵琨, 刘跃华

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 16-22.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8) : 16-22. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.002
专题分析

医疗机构与长护机构服务内容和价格对比研究

  • 王思彤1, 刘昭2,3, 张帆2,3, 段承阿鑫2,3, 艾丹丹2,3, 张旭4, 赵琨2,3, 刘跃华3,5
作者信息 +

Comparative Study on Service Contents and Prices Between Medical Institutions and Long-Term Care Institutions

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 本研究通过对比医疗机构与长护机构在护理、康复等服务项目、价格、人力成本等方面的差异,为完善长护服务价格机制提供意见与建议。方法: 整理分析38家基本医疗保险定点医疗机构、29家长期护理保险护理服务机构开展的护理项目、价格、人力成本等内容,总结对比医疗机构与长护机构在护理分级标准、服务项目分类和内容、价格及人力成本等方面的差异。结果: 在公立医院政府指导价和养老机构市场调节价的不同定价机制下,长护机构与医疗机构服务项目价格呈现较大差异。讨论与建议: 推行“支付标准–服务项目价格”二元机制,以长护险支付标准引导服务合理定价;实施弹性监管,尊重长期护理服务市场规律;深化医疗机构护理服务价格调整,构建 “医疗–长护”价格衔接机制;建立分级服务标准,强化服务连续性。

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the differences of medical institutions and long-term care insurance institutions in service items, prices, and labor costs of nursing and rehabilitation, to provide suggestions and recommendations for improving the pricing mechanism of long-term care services. Methods: Nursing items, prices, and labor costs from 38 medical insurance designated institutions and 29 long-term care insurance designated institutions were analyzed to summarize differences in nursing grading standards, service item classification and content, prices, and labor costs between the two types of institutions. Results: Service prices vary significantly due to different pricing mechanisms: government - guided prices in public hospitals and market - regulated prices in elderly care institutions. Discussions and Suggestions: We should implement a dual mechanism of "payment standard-service price" and guide reasonable pricing of services based on long-term care insurance payment standards, conduct flexible supervision and respect the laws of the long-term care service market, deepen the adjustment of nursing service prices in medical institutions and establish a price linkage mechanism between medical institutions and long-term care insurance institutions, and set graded service standards and strengthen service continuity.

关键词

长期护理保险 / 长期护理服务项目 / 价格对比 / 支付标准

Key words

long-term care insurance / long-term care service items / price comparison / payment standard

引用本文

导出引用
王思彤, 刘昭, 张帆, 段承阿鑫, 艾丹丹, 张旭, 赵琨, 刘跃华. 医疗机构与长护机构服务内容和价格对比研究[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(8): 16-22 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.002
Comparative Study on Service Contents and Prices Between Medical Institutions and Long-Term Care Institutions[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(8): 16-22 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.8.002
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 王海银,苏锦英,金春林.上海市中医类医疗服务价格水平研究——基于上海与五个城市的比较分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(07):63-67.
[2] 郑大喜. 基于比价规则的医疗服务价格分类形成与动态调整[J].中国医疗保险,2025(06):51-57.
[3] 郭忆梅. 上海公办养老机构服务定价问题研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2024.
[4] 卢建平,王波,王俊.我国养老服务供给与定价机制研究[J].价格理论与实践,2016(05):97-99.
[5] 徐陆欣怡,孙奕萱,尹适成,等.省域内各地区医疗服务价格的对比研究——以湖北省6个州市为例[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(08):64-67+72.
[6] 谭玲,邓萱,张媚,等.医疗服务价格水平差异评价及政策启示——以四川省为例[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(12):47-51.
[7] 王贞,封进.长期护理保险对医疗费用的替代效应及不同补偿模式的比较[J].经济学(季刊),2021,21(02):557-576.
[8] 马晓雯,谢红.养老服务定价模式的现状及启示[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(02):479-482.
[9] 徐建红,陈建梅.我国民营养老机构发展存在的问题与对策研究综述[J].对外经贸,2017(01):71-73.
[10] 朱微微,舒婷,黄成礼,等.国外老年人口长期护理服务支付方式及其对中国的启示[J].中国护理管理,2010,10(02):69-71.
[11] 李民,王震,朱凤梅.照护服务对医疗服务利用的影响研究[J].保险研究,2025(06):18-30.

基金

国家医疗保障局课题“长护险服务项目目录动态调整机制”; 国家医疗保障局课题“长护险监测咨询和分析服务”

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/