医保支付资格记分规则适用与责任认定的法理探析

乐煦

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 63-67.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 63-67. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.7.008
深度聚焦

医保支付资格记分规则适用与责任认定的法理探析

  • 乐煦
作者信息 +

Jurisprudential Analysis of the Application and Liability Determination of Scoring Rules in Healthcare Security Payment Eligibility Management

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 明确医保支付资格记分规则的适用边界,构建科学的责任认定体系。方法: 基于比例原则与制度目标协调视角,论证记分范围,提出记分触发阈值;从主观过错、原因力强度等维度构建四要件归责体系。结果: 记分范围泛化和责任认定不清是主要挑战,阈值设定可防止责任泛化,四要件体系可区分主要、重要及一般责任。结论: 精准追责有助于提升基金监管效能与制度公信力。

Abstract

Objective: The paper attempts to clarify the application range of the scoring rules for healthcare security payment eligibility and establish a scientific responsibility recognition system. Methods: Based on the principle of proportionality and the perspective of coordinating institutional goals, the paper demonstrates the scoring range and proposes a scoring trigger threshold, meanwhile, it constructs a four-element attribution system from the dimensions of subjective fault, causative potency, etc. Results: The main challenges are the generalization of scoring scope and unclear identification of responsibilities. Threshold setting can prevent the generalization of responsibilities, and the four-element system can distinguish between primary, important, and general responsibilities. Conclusion: Precise accountability can help improve the efficiency and institutional credibility of medical insurance fund supervision.

关键词

医疗保障 / 行政处罚 / 医保支付资格 / 责任层级 / 归责要件

Key words

healthcare security / administrative penalty / healthcare security payment eligibility / hierarchy of liability / elements of liability imputation

引用本文

导出引用
乐煦. 医保支付资格记分规则适用与责任认定的法理探析[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(7): 63-67 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.7.008
Jurisprudential Analysis of the Application and Liability Determination of Scoring Rules in Healthcare Security Payment Eligibility Management[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(7): 63-67 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.7.008
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 国家医保局,国家卫生健康委,国家药监局.关于建立定点医药机构相关人员医保支付资格管理制度的指导意见[EB/OL].(2024-09-27)[2025-06-30].http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/9/27/art_104_13996.html.
[2] 杨红燕,周致远,刘肖,等.我国医保医师支付资格记分管理的改革逻辑、挑战及对策[J].医学与社会,2025,38(06):94-99.
[3] 国家医疗保障局. 2023年全国医疗保障事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2024-07-25)[2025-06-30].https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/7/25/art_7_13340.html.
[4] 刘权. 论必要性原则的客观化[J].中国法学,2016(05):178-195.
[5] 梅扬. 比例原则的适用范围与限度[J].法学研究,2020,42(02):57-70.
[6] 张晓波. 过失应受行政处罚行为的认定研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2024.
[7] 肖俏. 行政决策追责中领导人行政责任认定研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2018.
[8] 陈兴良. 从归因到归责:客观归责理论研究[J].法学研究,2006(02):70-86.
[9] 劳东燕. 事实因果与刑法中的结果归责[J].中国法学,2015(02):131-159.
[10] 陈璇. 注意义务的规范本质与判断标准[J].法学研究,2019,41(01):136-154.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/