摘要
药品追溯码制度在全国范围内逐步落地实施,各地医保部门会陆续主动或被动接受医药机构销售“回流药”“假药”案件处理,无论协议处理还是行政处罚,无非是以医保协议或《医疗保障基金使用监督管理条例》及本地地方性法规、规章为依据。销售“回流药”“假药”还触犯《中华人民共和国药品管理法》等药监领域法律法规,违法行为竞合情况下,如何才能在遵守《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》“择一重处”原则框架下做好案件处理尤其罚款决定,本文以医保定点医药机构销售“回流药”行为的处理为辨析标靶,力求厘清其间法理逻辑,提出学术建议,推荐最优模式,供医保部门办案机关参考。
Abstract
The system of drug traceability codes is gradually implemented nationwide, and medical insurance departments will deal with cases involving the sale of "backflow drugs" and "fake drugs" by medical institutions, either proactively or passively. Whether it is a protocol processing or an administrative penalty, it is based on the medical insurance agreement, The Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of the Use of Healthcare Security Funds and local laws and regulations. The sale of "backflow drugs" and "fake drugs" also violates the Drug Administration Law of the People's Republic of China and other drug supervision laws and regulations. In the case of a conflict of illegal acts, how to properly handle cases, especially penalty decisions, under the framework of the "choose the heavier punishment" principle of The Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China. This article takes the handling of the selling of "backflow drugs" by medical insurance designated medical institutions as the target of analysis, tries to clarify the legal logic, put forward academic suggestions, and recommend the optimal model for the reference of the case handling organizations of medical insurance department.
关键词
回流药 /
假药 /
罚款 /
择一重处
Key words
backflow drugs /
fake drugs /
fine /
choose the heavier punishment
冯如雁.
销售“回流药”处理模式法理辨析[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(5): 20-25 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.5.003
A Legal Analysis on the Process Mode of Selling "Backflow Drugs"[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(5): 20-25 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.5.003
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 广东省药品监督管理局官网.广东省药品安全巩固提升专项行动典型案例(第四批)[EB/OL].(2024-01-06)[2025-03-27].http://mpa.gd.gov.cn/ztzl/ygzwzl/xzcf/bgt/content/post_4327878.html.
[2] 中国裁判文书网.庞某梅掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得等二审刑事裁定书[EB/OL].(2024-06-22)[2025-03-29].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=h7gy3em4cb/vAYm9j6bdNAFCkGZTTkx4WtmPGtukP5GPf8Jch37PypO3qNaLMqsJZf8q8KwbR0+4H3rZqNtryMGhR9K3fVYjOXl9o95z8HaelEipKWTEiWCI7vfXMdXc.
[3] 杨伟东.中华人民共和国行政处罚法理解与适用[M].北京:法制出版社,2021:105-106.
[4] 刘润芝,毛尚文.“同一个违法行为”违反多个法律规范的法律适用探讨[J].中国公路,2022,(14):12-15.
[5] 中国市场监管行政处罚文书网.平江县市场监督管理局行政处罚决定书[EB/OL].(2024-11-18)[2025-05-12].https://cfws.samr.gov.cn/detail.html?docid=43430000C202400000050761.
[6] 中国政府网.国家医疗保障局职能配置、内设机构和人员编制规定[EB/OL].(2018-09-11)[2025-05-13].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/11/content_5320980.htm.
[7] 许安标.中华人民共和国行政处罚法释义[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021:104-105.
[8] 翟继光,王海洋.《中华人民共和国处理处罚法》释义与典型案例分析[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社,2021:171-172.
[9] 刘连泰.行政处罚中择一重罚规则的体系化阐释[J].法学研究,2022(1):38-51.
[10] 中国市场监管行政处罚文书网.福鼎市市场监督管理局行政处罚决定书(鼎市监处罚〔2025〕2-03号)[EB/OL].(2025-01-26)[2025-05-13].https://cfws.samr.gov.cn/detail.html?docid=d7150696b47540432ce8b39873a664f3.