涉第三人情形下医保基金先行支付的法律规制问题研究

孙胤博, 钟翼飞

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12) : 41-46.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12) : 41-46. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.12.005
观察思考

涉第三人情形下医保基金先行支付的法律规制问题研究

  • 孙胤博1,2, 钟翼飞2
作者信息 +

Research on the Legal Regulation of Advance Payment by Medical Insurance Funds in Cases Involving Third Parties

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

我国已针对涉第三人情形下医保基金的先行支付制度构建起相应的法律体系,初步形成了较为完善的法律规制框架,为医保基金的先行支付及后续追偿提供了基础性法律保障。然而,现行法律规制仍存在法律规定内容缺漏、相关法律法规落实不到位、制度宣传不足等问题,导致在实践中,涉第三人医保基金的先行支付面临线索发现困难、追偿效率偏低等现实困境。为有效应对上述问题,有必要进一步完善医保基金先行支付相关法律规范的具体内容,强化法律法规的执行与落实效果,并加强制度宣传以提高社会公众的认知水平,从而系统性地健全我国涉第三人情形下医保基金先行支付的法律规制体系。

Abstract

China has introduced corresponding laws and regulations regarding the advance payment system of medical insurance funds in cases involving third parties, and has initially established a relatively complete legal regulatory framework, providing a basic legal guarantee for the advance payment and subsequent recovery of medical insurance funds. However, existing legal regulations still have issues such as gaps in legal provisions, inadequate implementation of laws and regulations, and insufficient promotion of system, which in turn leads to difficulties in discovering clues for advance payment by medical insurance funds in third-party cases and low efficiency in recovery in current practice. To address these challenges, the content of relevant legal laws and regulations for advance payment of medical insurance funds should be improved, their enforcement strengthened, and legal publicity enhanced to raise public awareness, further improving the legal regulatory system for advance payment of medical insurance funds in cases involving third parties in China.

关键词

医保基金 / 先行支付 / 第三人 / 法律规制

Key words

medical insurance fund / advance payment / third party / legal regulation

引用本文

导出引用
孙胤博, 钟翼飞. 涉第三人情形下医保基金先行支付的法律规制问题研究[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2025, 0(12): 41-46 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.12.005
Research on the Legal Regulation of Advance Payment by Medical Insurance Funds in Cases Involving Third Parties[J]. China Health Insurance. 2025, 0(12): 41-46 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2025.12.005
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 张景卫. 医保基金先行支付医疗费的侵权纠纷处理路径探析[J].法律适用,2019(16):91-98.
[2] 夏磊,丁丽.第三人侵权时医保基金先行支付相关问题探究[J].现代医学,2023,51(S1):56-61.
[3] 周子力,王可欣,张鑫,等.医疗保险欺诈的典型形式与监管措施研究——基于国家医疗保障局公开的179起骗保典型案例研究[J].卫生软科学,2025,39(02):73-78.
[4] 杨传奇. 新医改背景下医保基金监管效能提升策略[J].投资与创业,2025,36(15):179-181.
[5] 向春华. 损害赔偿之诉中应否扣除医保先行给付费用[J].中国医疗保险,2019(12):41-43.
[6] 刘孟嘉,张金穗,陈文,等.定点医疗机构信用管理在医保基金监管中的重要性与实现策略[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(11):32-36.
[7] 冯如雁. 医疗损害责任纠纷案件处置医保基金方式及改进策略[J].中国医疗保险,2023 (05):42-46.
[8] 顾梅,赵宁,李进,等.我国门诊医保支付方式改革的实践探索和启示[J].中国医院管理,2025,45(04):30-34.
[9] 王贞,封进,刘一恒.医保基金监管的震慑效应:理论与实证分析[J].管理世界,2025,41(10): 109-132.
[10] 杨锦刚. 医保基金先行支付与追偿途径的思考[J].四川劳动保障,2019(08):25.
[11] 许金鹏,程菲儿,康正,等.我国公众参与医保基金监管阻碍因素与破解策略研究[J].中国医院管理,2025,45(10):54-59.
[12] 蔡明荣.浅析医保基金先行支付及代位追偿机制[J].时代金融,2018(14):216+218.
[13] 陈真波,杜涛.民营医院医保骗保行为侦查打击研究[J].贵州警察学院学报,2025,37(03):64-70.
[14] 王煜昊,顾钰祺,徐伟.我国医保基金常态化监管的实现路径研究[J].卫生经济研究,2025,42(10):28-31+36.
[15] 傅天一,赵勇.市医保局三管齐下织密基金安全“保障网”[N].淮北日报,2025-09-28(004).
[16] 叶延玺. 涉第三人情形下医疗费用的社保先行支付与追偿——以《社会保险法》第三十条第二款和第四十二条为中心[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2019,34(06):102-110.
[17] 孙诗卉,王盼盼.上海首例由医保中心起诉的追偿案获胜[N].21世纪经济报道,2025-03-27(008).
[18] 吴为民. 医保基金代位求偿制度的法理探讨与完善建议——以交通事故第三人侵权案件为例[J].中国医疗保险,2023(12):72-76.
[19] 马野. 浙江省医保基金先行支付制度的实施难点和思考[J].卫生经济研究,2013(05):33-36.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/