医疗保障行政处罚裁量基准纵议

张勇, 赵新冬, 冯如雁

中国医疗保险 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 82-88.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 82-88. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2024.7.010
深度聚焦

医疗保障行政处罚裁量基准纵议

  • 张勇1, 赵新冬1, 冯如雁2
作者信息 +

Discussion on the Discretion Standards for Healthcare Security Administrative Penalties

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

医保部门成立时间较短,专业行政执法人员不足,查办行政处罚案件数量较少。行政处罚裁量基准的制定执行可以为执法机关提供执法尺度遵循,保证案件处罚裁量合理。医保部门现行32部省级行政处罚裁量基准各有特色,但实案不遵循裁量基准、裁量因素架空裁量阶次、初次违法标准不明确、违法金额统计口径混乱、未体现对社会经济发展状况的考量等问题也普遍存在。本文解析并探索改进完善医疗保障行政处罚裁量基准,以期精准指导办案,有效规范执法行为。

Abstract

The healthcare security department has been established for a short time, professional administrative law enforcement are understaffed, and the number of administrative penalty cases investigated is small. The formulation and implementation of administrative penalty discretion standards can provide law enforcement agencies with enforcement standards, ensuring reasonable discretion in case penalties. Each of the 32 current provincial administrative penalty discretion standards of the medical insurance department has its own characteristics, but there are also some common problems in discretion of cases, such as not following the discretion standards, overriding the discretion order of discretion factors, unclear initial violation standards, confusion in the statistical caliber of illegal amounts, and failure to reflect the social and economic development status. This article analyzes and explores the improvement of administrative penalty discretion standards for healthcaresecurity, in order to accurately guide case handling and effectively regulate law enforcement behavior.

关键词

医疗保障行政处罚裁量基准 / 裁量阶次 / 裁量因素 / 初次违法 / 违法金额

Key words

medical insurance administrative penalty discretion standard / discretion order / discretion factors / initial violation / illegal amount

引用本文

导出引用
张勇, 赵新冬, 冯如雁. 医疗保障行政处罚裁量基准纵议[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2024, 0(7): 82-88 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2024.7.010
Discussion on the Discretion Standards for Healthcare Security Administrative Penalties[J]. China Health Insurance. 2024, 0(7): 82-88 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2024.7.010
中图分类号: F840.684    C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 国务院办公厅.关于进一步规范行政裁量权基准制定和管理工作的意见:国办发〔2022〕27号[EB/OL].(2022-08-17)[2024-05-20].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-08/17/content_5705729.htm.
[2] 山西省医疗保障局曝光台2024年第一期曝光典型案件(六例)[EB/OL].(2024-04-28)[2024-05-20].https://ybj.shanxi.gov.cn/ztzl/ybbgt/202404/t20240428_9551197.html.
[3] 许安标. 中华人民共和国行政处罚法释义[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社,2021.
[4] 袁雪石. 中华人民共和国行政处罚法释义[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021.
[5] 中南大学湘雅医院行政处罚情况[EB/OL].(2023-12-04)[2023-12-05].http://ybj.hunan.gov.cn/ybj/zfgs/202312/t20231204_32455716.html.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/