目的: 探索科学、合理的医保谈判药品先行自付比例制定策略。方法: 梳理国内典型地区谈判药品先行自付比例的实践经验,基于委托代理和利益相关者理论,探索可行的谈判药品先行自付比例制定策略。结果: 基于典型地区实践,本研究总结出五类常见的先行自付比例制定方式,认为第五类差异化形成谈判药品先行自付比例区间的方式更符合新时代医保管理需求。同时,本文从医保、患者、医疗机构、医药企业四方视角分别提出了影响谈判药品先行自付比例的因素,并设计了基于“基准比例和调整幅”的谈判药品先行自付比例的制定策略,能够在保证医保基金安全的前提下,平衡患者用药负担,促进临床用药合理化。结论: 建议各地建立科学、合理、透明的谈判药品先行自付比例制定机制,探索谈判药品先行自付比例动态调整机制,在此基础上可逐步完善常规乙类药品的先行自付比例管理。
Abstract
Objective: The paper attempts to explore scientific and reasonable strategies for the formulation of national negotiated drug prior self-financed ratio. Methods: The study summarizes the practical experience of national negotiated drug prior self-financed ratio in typical areas in China, and explores feasible strategies for the formulation of national negotiated drug prior self-financed ratio based on principal-agent and stakeholder theories. Results: The study summarizes five common methods of formulating the prior self-financed ratio based on the practice in typical regions, and concludes that the fifth way of forming a differentiated range for multiple negotiated drug prior self-financed ratio is more in line with the needs of medical insurance management in the new era. At the same time, the factors affecting the prior self-financed ratio of national negotiated drugs are proposed from the perspectives of medical insurance, patients, medical institutions and pharmaceutical enterprises, and a strategy based on the "benchmark ratio and adjustment range" is devised for the formulation of prior self-financed ratio of negotiated drugs, which can relieve the burden of patients' medicines while ensuring the safety of the health insurance fund and promote the rational drug use. Conclusion: Each region should establish a scientific, reasonable and transparent mechanism for the formulation of national negotiated drug prior self-financed ratio, explore the dynamic adjustment mechanism, and gradually improve the management of self payment ratio of regular Category B drugs on this basis.
关键词
国家谈判药品 /
先行自付比例 /
策略研究
Key words
national negotiated drugs /
prior self-financed ratio /
strategy research
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李许良.医疗保险道德风险理论探讨与实证研究[D].天津:天津医科大学,2013.
[2] 曹乾,杜雯雯,沈磊,等.社会医疗保险共付制度对居民健康影响[J].中国公共卫生,2009,7:2.
[3] 杨冰一,孟庆跃,袁蓓蓓,等.美国雇主医疗保险共付费用变化的影响及启示[J].中国卫生经济,2012,31(11):3.
[4] 陶阳红.江苏省贵重医用耗材医疗保险管理研究[D].南京:东南大学,2015.
[5] 汤励德,刘宗培,宋明波.乙类药品自付比例作用实证分析[J].中国医疗保险,2012,1:3.
[6] 丁锦希,潘越,李伟,等.医保谈判准入创新生物制品支付标准调整机制研究[J].中国医药工业杂志,2019,50(6):8.
[7] 药融云.2022年全国药品销售数据出炉[EB/OL].(2023-04-25)[2023-07-20].https://m.baidu.com/bh/m/detail/ar_8895855208133202641.
[8] 郭晓昕,颜敏,李少丽.国内外儿童用药现状与思考[J].中国药房,2000,11(5):3.
[9] 路娜娜,徐伟,李赛赛.中日韩罕见病药品价格水平对比研究[J].中国卫生经济,2020,39(12):5.
[10] 王雅楠,官海静,刘国恩,等.台湾地区医保药品的采购模式和支付价格[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(12):18-22.
[11] 常峰,崔鹏磊,夏强,等.德国药品参考价格体系对构建我国医保支付标准的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(07):55-60.
[12] 王煜昊,徐伟,李赛赛,等.日本医保药品目录动态调整机制研究及对我国的启示[J].中国卫生经济,2019,38(09):93-96.
[13] 高龙,杨宏昕.澳大利亚仿制药政策对我国的启示[J].中国新药杂志,2019,28(12):1418-1422.