目的: 基于长期护理保险试点扩大和实施进程不断深化的背景,探索为中度失能人员提供长期护理服务的有效路径。方法: 借助中国健康与养老追踪调查2018年数据,使用Barthel指数评估老人失能情况。结果: (1)我国60岁以上老人中度失能率约为2.12%-2.95%,根据第七次人口普查数据测算,60岁以上中度失能老人约为559.7万人—778.8万人;(2)中度失能老人进食、穿衣、大小便控制、如厕、上下床等日常生活活动能力评分较高,洗澡、上下楼、平地行走等项目得分较低,在商店购买物品、做饭、做家务、洗澡这几项活动上有人帮助的比例分别是70.5%、69.5%、67%、68.1%;(3)大口径计算的中度失能老人慢病率约为29.4%,住院率为39%,CES-D抑郁评分15.027,存在中、重度抑郁情况。结论: 建议逐步把中度失能老人纳入长期护理保险保障范围,通过政策引导中度失能老人选择经济上可负担性更高的居家护理服务。
Abstract
Objective: Based on the background of the expansion and deepening of long-term care insurance pilots, the paper explores effective paths to provide long-term care services for moderately disabled individuals. Methods: This paper uses the data of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) in 2018 and Barthel index to evaluate the disability of the elderly. Results: (1) The moderate disability rate of elderly people aged over 60 in China is approximately 2.12% to 2.95%. According to the data from the 7th National Population Census, the number of moderate disability people aged over 60 is approximately 5.597 million to 7.788 million. (2) The moderately disabled elderly have higher scores on daily living activities such as eating, dressing, the defecation control, going to the toilet, and getting in and out of bed, and lower scores on bathing, going upstairs and downstairs, and walking on the ground. In addition, 70.5%, 69.5%, 67% and 68.1% of the moderately disabled elderly were assisted in shopping in the stores, cooking, housework and bathing, respectively. (3) According to the large caliber calculation, the chronic disease prevalence rate of the moderately disabled elderly was 29.4%, the hospitalization rate was 39%, the CES-D depression score was 15.027, and there was moderate and severe depression. Conclusions: It is suggested to gradually include the moderately disabled elderly into the scope of long-term care insurance and guide the moderately disabled to choose more affordable home care services through policies.
关键词
长期护理保险 /
中度失能 /
失能风险 /
Barthel指数
Key words
long-term care insurance /
moderate disability /
disability risk /
Barthel index
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 周四娟,原彰.我国长期护理保险失能等级评定量表的比较研究——以15个试点城市为例[J].卫生经济研究,2021,38(8):59-62.
[2] 张文娟,付敏.长期护理保险制度中老年人的失能风险和照料时间——基于Barthel指数的分析[J].保险研究,2020,(05):80-93.
[3] JOHN CREIGHTON CAMPBELL,NAOKI IKEGAMI,MARY JO GIBSON.Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan[J].Health Affairs,2010,29(1):87-95.
[4] 陈璐,时晓爽.中国长期护理保险基金需求规模预测[J].中国人口科学,2021,(6):54-67,127.
[5] 刘方涛,费清.中国长期护理保险需求规模预测和保障路径研究——基于第七次人口普查数据的测算[J].保险研究,2023,(3):59-69.
[6] 陈卫.中国人口负增长与老龄化趋势预测[J].社会科学辑刊,2022,(5):133-144.
[7] 姚虹.老龄危机背景下我国长期护理保险制度试点方案的比较与思考[J].社会保障研究,2020,(1): 48-56.
[8] 荆门日报.孙兵在市长期护理保险制度试点工作领导小组会上强调,大胆深化试点改革真正把好事办好实事办实[EB/OL].(2019-08-06)[2023-05-28].https://www.jingmen.gov.cn/art/2019/8/6/art_438_177029.html.
[9] 高京,欧阳江峰,阴佳,等.山东省长期护理保险实施现状与思考[J].中国医疗保险,2022,(11):60-64.
[10] 王贞,封进.长期护理保险对医疗费用的替代效应及不同补偿模式的比较[J].经济学(季刊),2021,21(2):557-576.
[11] 刘涛.德国长期护理保险制度的缘起、运行、调整与改革[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,49(1):74-86.
[12] YONG V, SAITO Y.National Long-term Care Insurance Policy in Japan a Decade After Implementation: Some Lessons for Aging Countries[J].Ageing International, 2011,(37): 1-14.
[13] 孙计领.失能对老年人主观福利的影响研究[J].西北人口,2021,42(5):55-66.
基金
广州市哲学社会科学发展十四五规划2023年度共建课题“广州市农村互助型长期护理保险可行性研究”(2023GZGJ200)