不同等级医疗机构对集采药品采购量变化的贡献率差异比较

文小桐, 赵秋玲, 刘雨欣, 段凤然, 王越, 毛宗福

中国医疗保险 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11) : 122-128.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11) : 122-128. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2023.11.017
医药经纬

不同等级医疗机构对集采药品采购量变化的贡献率差异比较

  • 文小桐1,2, 赵秋玲1,2, 刘雨欣2,3, 段凤然1,2, 王越1,2, 毛宗福1,2,3
作者信息 +

Comparison of the Contribution Rate of Different Levels of Public Medical Institutions to the Changes in Centralized Drug Procurement Volume

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 分析比较集中带量采购政策实施后不同等级医疗机构药品采购量变化的贡献率差异。方法: 选取国家药品供应保障综合管理信息平台2018年1月至2020年12月的药品采购数据,分析7个试点城市不同等级公立医疗机构药品采购量及其变化量的贡献率。结果: 从试点期集采品种采购量增长情况来看,三级医疗机构贡献率最高(58.03%),接续期则是基层医疗机构贡献率最高(103.29%)。可替代品种采购量增加,试点期、接续期均是基层医疗机构贡献率最高(54.87%和72.88%)。B01抗血栓形成药在试点期中选药品采购量增长,基层医疗机构贡献率最高(45.62%)。C08钙通道阻滞剂、C09作用于肾素-血管紧张素系统在试点期、接续期中选药品采购量增长,均为基层医疗机构贡献率最高。L01抗肿瘤药在试点期、接续期中选药品采购量增长,均为三级医疗机构贡献率最高。结论: 在接续期,基层医疗机构对采购量增加的贡献率进一步增加,部分治疗类别药品采购量增加,其中基层医疗机构贡献率最高。

Abstract

Objective: The paper analyzes and compares the differences in the contribution rate of different levels of public medical institutions to the change of drug procurement volume after the national centralized volume-based procurement (NCVBP). Methods: Data on the drug procurement records of from January 2018 to December 2020 were obtained from the China Drug Supply Information Platform (CDSIP). The contribution rate of different levels of public medical institutions on drug procurement volume and procurement expenditure from 7 pilot cities was analyzed. Results: The contribution rate of tertiary medical institutions was the highest (58.03%) during the pilot period on the increase in the purchase volume of centralized varieties, but the contribution rate of primary medical institutions was the highest (103.29%) during the continuation period. The contribution rate of primary medical institutions during the pilot period and the continuation period was the highest on the increase in the procurement volume of substitute varieties (54.87% and 72.88%). The contribution rate of primary medical institutions during the pilot period was the highest (45.62%) on the increase in the procurement expenditure of B01 antithrombotic bid-winning drug. The contribution rate of primary medical institutions during the pilot period and continuation period was the highest on the increase in the procurement volume of C08 calcium channel blocker, C09 acting on the renin-angiotensin system bid-winning drug. The contribution rate of tertiary medical institutions during the pilot period and the continuation period was the highest on the increase in the procurement volume of L01 anti-tumor bid-winning drug (89.21% and 61.85%). Conclusion: During the continuation period, the contribution rate of primary medical institutions to the increase in procurement volume increased during the continuation period. The procurement volume of some therapeutic drugs has increased, among which the contribution rate of primary medical institutions was the highest.

关键词

集中带量采购 / 采购量 / 贡献率

Key words

national centralized volume-based procurement / procurement volume / contribution rate

引用本文

导出引用
文小桐, 赵秋玲, 刘雨欣, 段凤然, 王越, 毛宗福. 不同等级医疗机构对集采药品采购量变化的贡献率差异比较[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2023, 0(11): 122-128 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2023.11.017
Comparison of the Contribution Rate of Different Levels of Public Medical Institutions to the Changes in Centralized Drug Procurement Volume[J]. China Health Insurance. 2023, 0(11): 122-128 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2023.11.017
中图分类号: F840.684C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 徐赟.药品集中采购的政策协同度评价及其优化策略研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2022.
[2] 林燕铭,周娜,韩汶静,等.药品集中带量采购政策对药品利用与支出的影响分析[J].中国卫生经济,2022,41(09):13-18.
[3] 陈缪丰,谢金平,王斌,等.常州市各级医院带量采购政策实施效果差异研究[J].中国卫生资源,2022,25(06):765-769.
[4] 徐源,宋捷,陈珉惺.上海医疗保险药品带量采购的政策效果及启示[J].中国卫生资源, 2022, 25(03):278-282.
[5] 文小桐,王越,段凤然,等.集采政策对不同等级公立医疗机构药品采购的影响[J].中国医疗保险,2023, (03):32-40.
[6] 石梦潇,李彧,王前强.欠发达地区分级诊疗的实施困境及对策研究——基于扎根理论[J].卫生经济研究,2023,40(05):18-22.
[7] 李大双,颜建周,白铭钰,等.抗菌药物实施国家集中带量采购的政策效果分析[J].中国卫生经济,2023,42(05):17-21.
[8] WENQIANG WEI, ZENG HONGMEI, ZHENG RONGSHOU, et al.Cancer registration in China and its role in cancer prevention and control[J].The lancet oncology, 2020,21(7):342-349.
[9] World-Health-Organization-International Cancer.World cancer report:cancer research for cancer prevention[EB/OL].(2020-02-04)[2022-06-29].World Cancer Report-IARC (who.int).
[10] 万茜,王晶,顾申勇.国家药品集中采购对3种抗肿瘤药物临床使用的影响[J].中国药业,2022, 31(16):15-18.
[11] 党秀云,李霖.我国分级诊疗的政策叙事、历史呈现与实现进路——基于历史制度主义的分析[J].行政论坛,2023,30(01):108-117.
[12] 张旭,许欣悦,唐佳骥,等.北京市某三级医院落实国家药品集中采购改革数据分析[J].中国医药导报,2020,17(07):172-175.
[13] 焦翔,陈国强,程纯,等.基于医联体平台的上海市不同等级医院协作机制研究[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(04):23-25.

基金

国家卫生健康委委托项目“药品集中带量采购联动改革政策研究”(250071454); 国家卫生健康委委托项目“药品使用监测数据宏观分析指标研究与国家组织药品集中采购药品使用情况研究”(250000188)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/