目的: 提出一种基于患者病情客观严重程度的医保支付方式,进一步提升我国DRG/DIP对严重内科疾病支付的科学性、精准性。方法: 以脓毒症为例,根据疾病发展规律和临床资源消耗的内在逻辑,选择恰当的临床病情评估工具（序贯器官衰竭估计评分,SOFA评分）,分析医疗费用的影响因素,采用多元线性回归步进法进行回归分析,构建支付模型。结果: SOFA评分与医疗费用显著相关,相关系数为0.786（p<0.001）,线性回归模型拟合度良好（单变量R2=0.615,双变量R2=0.732）。结论: 根据SOFA评分对脓毒症进行医保支付具有可行性,能够更好适应临床需要、体现医疗价值。
Abstract
Objective: The paper proposes a payment method based on the severity of patients' conditions to further improve the scientificity and accuracy of DRG/DIP payment for severe internal diseases. Methods: Taking sepsis as an example, appropriate clinical evaluation tools (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, SOFA Score) were selected to analyze the influencing factors of medical expenses based on the development of disease and the internal logic of clinical resource consumption. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used for the regression analysis and construction of payment model. Results: The SOFA score is significantly correlated with medical expenses, with a correlation coefficient of 0.786 (p<0.001). The linear regression model fits well, and the R2 of univariate is 0.615 and the R2 of bivariate is 0.732. Conclusion: Using SOFA score for the medical insurance payment of sepsis is feasible, which can better fit clinical needs and reflect medical value.
关键词
SOFA评分 /
脓毒症 /
回归分析 /
医保支付方式 /
费用
Key words
SOFA score /
sepsis /
regression analysis /
medical insurance payment /
cost
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 黄华波.DRG/DIP支付方式改革的预期效果[J].中国医疗保险,2022(08).
[2] SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN CS, SEYMOUR CW, et al.The third international consensus defnitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)[J].JAMA, 2016,315(8):801-10.
[3] GANDO S, NANZAKI S, SASAKI S, et al.Activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Critical Care Medicine,2000,26:2005-2009.
[4] 江伟,杜斌.中国脓毒症流行病学现状[J].医学研究生学报,2019(1).
[5] RUDD KE, JOHNSON SC, AGESA KM, et al.Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017:analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study[J].Lancet,2020,395(10219):200-11.
[6] VINCENT JL, MORENO R, TAKALA J,et al.The SOFA(Sepsis–related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfuntion／failure[J].Intensive Care Med,1996,22:707-710.
[7] 曹钰,柴艳芬,邓颖,等.中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J].临床急诊杂志,2018,19(09):567-588.
[8] 杜斌,陈德昌,刘大为.感染相关的器官衰竭评分对多器官功能障碍综合征预后判断的意义[J].中华医学杂志,2001,01:81(2).
[9] 王力鹏,陈军,罗穆玲,等.MEWS评分、APACHEⅡ评分及SOFA评分对急诊重症患者死亡风险的评价[J].广东医学,2018(03):893-896.
[10] 何文,申曙光.医保支付方式与医疗服务供方道德风险——基于医疗保险报销数据的经验分析[J].统计研究,2020(8):62-76.
[11] 沈雅萍.病例临床复杂(ECC)模型在DRGs分组器中的应用[D].北京中医药大学,2017.
[12] KRUISSELBRINK R, KWIZERA A, CROWTHER M, et al.Modified Early Warning Score(MEWS) identifies critical illness among ward patients in a resource restricted setting in Kampala, Uganda: a prospective observational study[J].PLoS one,2016,11(3).
[13] 廖美霞,何佳琳,杨燕绥.美国以价值为导向的肿瘤支付模式介绍及启示[J].中国卫生经济,2020,39(12):110-113.
