目的:对我国“互联网+”医疗服务相关政策进行梳理,探究政府政策工具使用偏好及倾向性,为政策的制定与优化提出建议。方法:对20份“互联网+”医疗服务相关政策进行编码整理,归纳为五类政策工具进行分析。结果:五类政策工具中,命令与规制型工具使用频率最高,能力建设型工具内部使用结构不合理,象征与劝诫型工具运用相对薄弱,激励型、系统变革型工具应用力度不够。结论:提高政策制定的合理性,优化政策工具内部结构,最大限度发挥政策效力。
Abstract
Objective: The paper summarizes the relevant policies of "Internet plus" medical service in China, explores the preference and inclination of the use of government policy tools, and puts forward suggestions for policy formulation and optimization. Methods: 20 "Internet plus" medical service-related policies were coded and classified into five types of policy tools for analysis. Results: Among the five types of policy tools, the use of command and regulation tools is most frequently used, the internal use structure of capacity building tools is unreasonable, the use of symbolic and persuasive tools is relatively weak, and the use of incentive and systematic transformation tools is insufficient. Conclusion: Rationality of the overall policy should be improved and the internal structure of each policy tool should be optimized to maximize the effectiveness of the policy.
关键词
“互联网+”医疗服务 /
政策工具 /
量化分析
Key words
"Internet plus" medical service /
policy tools /
quantitative analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 沈慧煌,赵静,傅云翔,等.政策工具视角下我国慢性病防控政策研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(13):1637-1643.
[2] J.Hannaway,N.Woodruff.Policy Instruments in Education[J].Review of Research in Education,2003(1):1-24.
[3] A.Schneider and H.Ingram.Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools[J].The Journal of Politics,1990,(2):510-529.
[4] 何雪松,罗力.互联网医疗的应用现状和发展趋势[J].中国卫生政策研究,2018,11(09):71-75.
[5] 徐媛媛. 政策工具分类理论的述评与建构[J].淮海工学院学报(社会科学版),2011,9(20):95-98.
[6] 张婷婷.“目标-工具”框架下的农民工城市融入政策研究[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(01):103-110+129.
[7] McDonnell, L.M. and R. F. Elmore. Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,1987,9( 2):133-152.