交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定术用于创伤性骨折的疗效及经济性比较

邹尚浏, 何生, 郭庭余, 余小曼

中国医疗保险 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 99-101.

中国医疗保险 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7) : 99-101. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2022.7.019
医药经纬

交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定术用于创伤性骨折的疗效及经济性比较

  • 邹尚浏, 何生, 郭庭余, 余小曼
作者信息 +

Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Cost of Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing and Internal Fixation with Steel Plate for Traumatic Fractures

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 比较交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定术用于创伤性骨折患者的疗效,探讨其对医疗费用的影响。方法: 随机选择在我院接受治疗的创伤性骨折患者58例,作为本次研究对象,选取时间范围在2018年2月—2022年2月之间,根据治疗方式的不同,平均分为对照组(n=29,钢板内固定术)和观察组(n=29,交锁髓内钉固定术),评估两组的治疗效果和费用,比较两组手术基础情况及并发症情况。结果: 观察组的手术时间、骨折愈合时间、医疗费用、住院时间、器材价格等均低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组总并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论: 交锁髓内钉治疗应用于创伤性骨折患者,不仅能缩短手术时间、骨折愈合时间及住院时间,而且节省医疗费用,显著降低并发症发生率以及器材价格,利于患者机体恢复正常,减轻患者经济负担。

Abstract

Objective: The article compared the efficacy of interlocking intramedullary nailing and internal fixation with steel plate in patients with traumatic fracture and their impact on medical expenses. Methods: 58 patients with traumatic fracture treated in my hospital from February 2018 to February 2022 were selected as subjects and randomly divided into control group (n=29, internal fixation with steel plate) and observation group (n=29, interlocking intramedullary nailing). The treatment effects of the two groups were evaluated, and the basic conditions and complications of the two groups were compared. Results: The operation time, fracture healing time, medical expenses, hospitalization time, price of consumables in the observation group was lower than those in the control group( p<0.05). The incidence of complication in observation group was lower than that in the control group ( p<0.05). Conclusion: Interlocking intramedullary nailing can shorten operation time, fracture healing time and the length of stay, reduce medical expenses, significantly reduce the incidence of complications and price of consumables, promote the rehabilitation of patients and reduce the economic burden of patients.

关键词

交锁髓内钉 / 钢板内固定术 / 创伤性骨折 / 医疗费用 / 住院时间

Key words

interlocking intramedullary nail / plate internal fixation / traumatic fracture / medical expenses / length of stay

引用本文

导出引用
邹尚浏, 何生, 郭庭余, 余小曼. 交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定术用于创伤性骨折的疗效及经济性比较[J]. 中国医疗保险. 2022, 0(7): 99-101 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2022.7.019
Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Cost of Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing and Internal Fixation with Steel Plate for Traumatic Fractures[J]. China Health Insurance. 2022, 0(7): 99-101 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2022.7.019
中图分类号: F840.684C913.7   

参考文献

[1] 喻景奕,周公社,位新维,等.阻挡钉快速置入技术在闭合复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨远侧干骺端骨折中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(2):127-132.
[2] 赵赞栋,秦妮,冯东旭.股骨闭合复位器联合股骨交锁髓内钉固定治疗股骨干骨折的临床观察[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(11):812-815.
[3] 王富强,孙斌,孔凡强,等.分叉交锁髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗肱骨骨折生物力学比较研究[J].临床军医杂志,2018,46(6):713-714.
[4] 刘增亮,彭政东.交锁髓内钉早期动力化在创伤性骨折治疗中的有效性及安全性研究[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(9):1281-1283.
[5] 宗双乐,苏立新,梁卫东,等.胫骨中远1/3骨折应用交锁髓内钉治疗时腓骨骨折不予固定的临床观察[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(2):141-144.
[6] 杜震,魏贤振,丁超,等.交锁髓内钉内固定治疗四肢开放性粉碎性骨折的疗效分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(6):459-462.
[7] Stenroos, Antti, Brinck, et al. Recommendation of use of checklists in tibial intramedullary nail removal: Retrospective study of mechanical complications related to nail removal[J]. INJURY, 2018, 49(7):1341-1347.
[8] Zhang W Q,Sun J,Liu C Y, et al.Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):2321.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/