Background: The inclusion of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in medical insurance coverage represents not only a breakthrough in the healthcare sector, but also a critical measure to implement the national population development strategy. By January 1, 2025, 31 provincial-level administrative regions and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps have incorporated ART into their medical insurance reimbursement schemes. However, existing studies have primarily focused on the impacts of this policy in the medical field, while neglecting its supporting role in the national population development strategy. Methods: Taking the policy practice of incorporating ART into medical insurance reimbursement as the entry point, this paper uses self-collected survey data and applies the Logit model to investigate the policy effect, group heterogeneity, and regional heterogeneity of this policy on the fertility intentions of the reproductive-age population. Results: First, the inclusion of ART in medical insurance reimbursement improves the fertility intentions of the reproductive-age population as a whole, with an overall increase of 2.9%, and this result passes a series of robustness tests. Second, the policy has a stronger positive effect on the fertility intentions of relatively older reproductive-age individuals, rural residents, and relatively low-income groups, who are the most direct beneficiaries of the policy. Third, the policy effect on fertility intentions is stronger among groups in regions that provide prenatal and postnatal care guidance, infertility prevention and treatment, reproductive health services, as well as childcare and family service centers, which indicates that attention should be paid to the coordination of fertility support policies. Fourth, in provincial-level administrative regions where ART was first included in the medical insurance reimbursement scope, projects with high coverage and multiple payment mechanisms have a stronger promoting effect on the fertility intentions of the reproductive-age group. However, the higher medical care level and the more frequent usage restrictions have weakened the intensity of the increase in fertility intentions. Conclusions: On the premise of ensuring the stable operation of the medical insurance fund, provincial-level administrative regions should prioritize expanding the scope of ART items eligible for medical insurance reimbursement, set reasonable limits on the level of medical security and the number of reimbursements, and actively provide supporting fertility-related services, so as to better promote the construction of a fertility-friendly society.
Key words
medical insurance /
assisted reproductive technology /
maternity insurance /
fertility intentions
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Jie Q, Yuanyuan W, Xiaohong L, et al.A Lancet Commission on 70 years of women's reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health in China[J]. The Lancet, 2021, 397(10293):2497-2536.
[2] Li L, Jin G, Lai X, et al.A reassessment of trends and rural-urban/regional differences in the total fertility rate in China, 2000-2020:analyses of the 2020 national census data[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1):8601.
[3] Jinno M, Tamura H, Yonei Y.Anti-aging medicine and reproductive health[J]. Anti-Aging Medicine, 2012, 9(1):6-13.
[4] 周灿权,罗璐.重视辅助生殖技术相关风险及其防治和管理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(10):961-965.
[5] 丛洪斌,翟凯,李顺平,等.辅助生殖助孕患者经济负担测算与可负担性评估[J].健康发展与政策研究,2025,28(3):350-357.
[6] 郑观蕾. 农村不孕女性辅助生殖治疗的经济压力与应对策略[J].医学与哲学,2024,45(24):38-43.
[7] 杨华磊,曹顺子,庄文灿,等.辅助生殖技术纳入医保报销的基金影响[J].中国医疗保险,2024(11):34-47.
[8] 孙思栋,高文书.延迟退休、生育支持政策与人口出生率[J].人口与经济,2025(2):16-30.
[9] 朱铭来,康琢.延迟退休、生育支持与生育率——基于制度关联效应与预期寿命不确定性的分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2026(3):131-144.
[10] 汪润泉,赵庆典.何种支持政策有效?——我国生育支持政策的保障水平与效果评价[J].南方人口,2025,40(4):25-34.
[11] 陈滔,胡安宁.生育支持组合对育龄人群二孩生育态度的影响——基于线上调查实验数据的发现[J].中国人口科学,2025,39(3):19-34.
[12] 侯梦舜,穆光宗.经济与心理双视角下就业稳定性与青年女性生育意愿——兼论生育支持政策的调节作用[J].中国人口科学,2026,40(3):18-35.
[13] 徐美琪,熊心愚.哪类生育支持政策更能促成高学历女性生育二孩的意愿?——基于服务支持、时间支持、经济支持政策的视角[J].教育经济评论,2025,10(5):105-128.
[14] 杨凡,王铭铭.生育支持政策预期效果对育龄人群生育计划的影响[J].人口研究,2025,49(3):66-81.
[15] 黄春元,何天琦,张小娜.促进生育之道:生育支持型税收政策能够提升生育意愿吗?[J].财经研究,2025,51(10):79-93.
[16] 黄春元,何天琦,董小雨.个人所得税改革对提升生育意愿的效应分析[J].税务研究,2026(4):94-101.
[17] 朱荟,孙迈.育儿补贴如何影响生育意愿?效应辨析与政策启示[J].南方人口,2026,41(1):28-38.
[18] 杨华磊,薛晴予,李双双,等.育儿补贴对个体再生育意愿的影响研究[J].人口学刊,2026,48(1):1-16.
[19] 夏翠翠,林宝.育龄妇女对生育假延长政策的评价与生育意愿研究——基于福建、广西调查数据的分析[J].社会政策研究,2026(2):39-54+179.
[20] 胡波,李灵春.生育意愿概念辨析[J].南方人口,2024,39(2):53-62.
[21] 余成普,李宛霖,邓明芬.希望与焦虑:辅助生殖技术中女性患者的具身体验研究[J].社会,2019,39(4):84-115.
[22] 董建卫,谭思远.外资流动、就业机会与个体教育匹配[J].金融评论,2025,17(5):26-48+140.
[23] 姜俊丰. 育龄群体二孩生育意愿的组态分析及其异质性[J].人口与社会,2026,42(3):10-21.
[24] 郑京平. Bootstrap方法在复杂抽样中的应用[J].统计研究,1987(1):55-60.
[25] 王林辉,周慧琳,钱圆圆,等.机器人应用冲击、职业可迁移技能和职业—技能合意性[J].管理世界,2024,40(11):85-104.
[26] 王瑶,狄文.卵子冷冻技术的应用进展[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2013,33(8):1171-1175.
[27] 杨冬梓,麦卓瑶.高龄多囊卵巢综合征患者的卵巢储备特点及其助孕结局[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2017,55(1):26-32.
[28] Machado P M, Sanz-de-Galdeano A. Coverage of infertility treatment and fertility outcomes[J].SERIEs,2015,6(4):407-439.
[29] 陆杰华,孙杨.教育—工作匹配状况对年轻人生育意愿的影响研究[J].中国人口科学,2024,38(3):66-80.
[30] 王志华,李夏培,樊增增.收入差距与生育意愿:促进还是抑制?[J].人口与发展,2024,30(6):13-26.
[31] 翟宝昕,刘峻嘉,李思宇.社区环境对家庭二胎生育意愿的影响机制研究[J].人文地理,2026,41(3):46-55.
[32] Groes F, Houstecka A, Iorio D, et al. The unequal battle against infertility:theory and evidence from IVF success[EB/OL]. (2024-01-16)[2026-08-15]. https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/74883.