Regulatory Law or Rights Law: Legislative Review and Institutional Optimization of the Second Reading Draft of the Healthcare Security Law

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 55-65.

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 55-65. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.006
Observation & Discussion

Regulatory Law or Rights Law: Legislative Review and Institutional Optimization of the Second Reading Draft of the Healthcare Security Law

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The Healthcare Security Law, from its 2021 Draft for Public Comments, through the 2025 First Reading Draft, to the 2026 Second Reading Draft, has undergone a conceptual shift from comprehensive omnibus legislation to a systematic framework law. The core of this transformation lies in the transition from a managerial paradigm centered on fund security to a rights-based paradigm anchored in citizens’ healthcare security entitlements. In response to current deficiencies, including a fragmented rights protection system, insufficient justiciability of legal norms, institutional disconnection within the multi-tiered framework, and a fund supervision model that prioritizes punishment over prevention, it is imperative to systematically construct a rights system with the right to medical security as the basis of claim, enhance the justiciability of legal norms, clarify the legal hierarchy and articulation mechanisms of the multi-tiered system, and establish a full-chain fund risk governance mechanism encompassing pre-event prevention, mid-event control, and post-event relief, thereby advancing the Healthcare Security Law as a fundamental law for the security of citizens’ rights.

Key words

the Healthcare Security Law / regulatory law / rights law / the right to healthcare security / legislative improvement

Cite this article

Download Citations
Regulatory Law or Rights Law: Legislative Review and Institutional Optimization of the Second Reading Draft of the Healthcare Security Law[J]. China Health Insurance. 2026, 0(6): 55-65 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.006

References

[1] 况贞勇,赵翔.基本医疗保险下自付费用公平性研究[J].重庆社会科学,2024(2):101-115.
[2] 孙淑云. 中国基本医疗保险立法困局、症结及其出路[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(3):142-150.
[3] 李彪.医疗保障法草案等多部法律草案将迎审议[N].每日经济新闻,2026-04-27(002).
[4] 罗豪才. 行政法之语义与意义分析[J].法制与社会发展,1995(4):11-13.
[5] 张文显,于宁.当代中国法哲学研究范式的转换——从阶级斗争范式到权利本位范式[J].中国法学,2001(1):63-79.
[6] 陈云良. 基本医疗卫生立法基本问题研究——兼评我国《基本医疗卫生与健康促进法(草案)》[J].政治与法律,2018(5):100-110.
[7] 中国医疗保障学会.《中华人民共和国医疗保障法(草案)》征求意见座谈会在京召开[EB/OL].(2025-07-15)[2026-05-15].https://caoss.org.cn/news/html?id=15755.
[8] 王东.《民法典》的社会治理价值:权利保护与秩序重构[J].新疆社会科学,2025(5):93-106+173-174.
[9] 华东政法大学.我校公共卫生治理研究中心组织召开《医疗保障法》(征求意见稿)讨论[EB/OL].(2021-07-22)[2026-05-15].https://news.ecupl.edu.cn/2021/0722/c672a181446/page.htm.
[10] 孙淑云. 多层次医疗保障体系化的法律调整与优化重塑[J].甘肃社会科学,2024(6):130-141.
[11] 胡敏洁.医疗保障立法的理想如何照进现实[N].上海法治报,2025-08-25(B01).
[12] 第一财经.医疗保障法草案体系建设未列商保,法律功能、定位引发讨论[EB/OL].(2025-07-25)[2026-05-17].https://m.yicai.com/news/102752407.html.
[13] 肖恒.立法法理学视野下政策法律化的证成[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(5):141-152+167.
[14] 娄宇. “医疗保障法”的定位是功能整合法和职能协助法[J].中国医疗保险,2021(9):41-42.
[15] 华颖. 医疗保障立法应紧抓五个关键问题发力[J].中国医疗保险,2021(9):42-43.
[16] 王天玉. 职工基本医疗保险个人账户的权利构造[J].法学,2021(8):165-176.
[17] 郑功成.从政策性文件主导走向法治化:中国特色医疗保障制度建设的必由之路[J].学术研究,2021(6):80-88+177.
[18] 李珍,王红波.中国医保战略购买的理论意蕴及实现路径[J].中国行政管理,2025(3):13-27.
[19] 李广德. 医疗保障法律体系的规范性构建[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2025(5):134-144.
[20] 夏勇. 权利哲学的基本问题[J].法学研究,2004(3):3-26.
[21] 罗雅文. 新时代护士法的立法构想——从“管理法”到“权利法”[J].医学与法学,2020(6):35-40.
[22] 刘耀辉. 国家义务的可诉性[J].法学论坛,2010(5):88-94.
[23] 王国龙. 裁判理性与司法权威[J].华东政法大学学报,2013(4):69-78.
[24] 刘敏. 论纠纷的可诉性[J].法律科学,西北政法学院学报,2003(1):73-79.
[25] 赵亚宁. 多层次医疗保障的体系整合与制度衔接——以健康权实现为中心[J].保险研究,2025(3):19-30.
[26] 王海漪. 慈善医疗的发展规律、现实困境与路径选择[J].学术研究,2023(10):101-107.
[27] 娄宇,谢琳琪.论《医疗保障法》的功能定位与立法路径[J].医学与法学,2023(4):1-8.
[28] 黄文艺. 论预防型法治[J].法学研究,2024(2):20-38.
[29] 凤凰网.人大教授郑功成:社保新司法解释并非全民强制保险,释放出了四个强烈信号[EB/OL].(2025-08-29)[2026-05-15].https://news.ifeng.com/c/8mCopKHPRfX.
[30] 郑晓珊. 工伤保险基金垫偿机制研究——以未参保之痛为背景[J].西部法学评论,2014(4):65-73.
[31] 中国新闻网.构建全民基本医疗保险的社会法基础[EB/OL].(2025-03-11)[2026-05-15].https://www.chinanews.com.cn/m/fortune/2015/03-11/7118028.shtml.
[32] 陈云良. 健康权的规范构造[J].中国法学,2019(5):64-79.
[33] 许中缘,翁雯.论基本医疗服务权的救济[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2):91-98+191.
[34] 中国社会科学院.学者探讨协同治理视角下的医疗保障立法[EB/OL].(2024-04-19)[2026-05-18].http://www.cass.cn/keyandongtai/xueshuhuiyi/202404/t20240419_5747103.shtml.
[35] 财新网.梁涛:商业健康险应主动做好与基本医保的衔接[EB/OL].(2025-10-22)[2026-05-28].https://finance.caixin.com/m/2025-10-22/102374547.html.
[36] 天津市医疗保障局.你关心的医保问题,两会代表声音在这里![EB/OL].(2025-03-06)[2026-05-18].https://ylbz.tj.gov.cn/ztzl/fzzfjs/fzzfjs/202503/t20250310_6877715.html.
[37] 戴卫东. 中国长期护理保险立法审视[J].社会保障评论,2024,8(1):59-73.
[38] 泰安市医疗保障局.严惩不贷——7起个人骗保案曝光后,我们该如何守护医保基金?[EB/OL].(2025-09-17)[2026-05-29].https://ylbzj.taian.gov.cn/art/2025/9/17/art_255174_10314451.html.
[39] 谭冰霖. 行政罚款设定的威慑逻辑及其体系化[J].环球法律评论,2021(2):22-38.
[40] 王惠麟,刘喜华.自愿参保原则下社会医疗保险逆向选择的实证检验[J].兰州财经大学学报,2026(3):146-156.
[41] 海南人大网.关于推行法定参加基本医疗保险的建议[EB/OL].(2021-03-09)[2026-05-25].https://hainanpc.gov.cn/eportal/ui?articleKey=aaaa5e22d3034b65bf7d9d942cf60813&columnId=6f7e6e0eac58410bbb88a743b062f50d&
pageId=ec9bc583c42c4cc2a5ab9282ace5cf68.
[42] 况贞勇,张甲岩.城乡居民基本医疗保险强制参加的正当性证成与制度构建[J].中国医疗保险,2026(4):52-61.
[43] 全国人民代表大会.医疗保障法草案二审稿加强医保基金使用管理——定点医药机构应严格执行实名就医规定[EB/OL].(2026-04-28)[2026-05-25].http://www.npc.gov.cn//npc/c2/c30834/202604/t20260428_454058.html.
[44] 于兆波,刘银平.风险社会视角下的立法决策观念转变——以权力和权利为中心展开[J].地方立法研究,2017(1):80-89.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉