Influence Mechanism and Empirical Study of How National Centralized Drug Procurement Incentivizes Innovation Input in Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 44-54.

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 44-54. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.005
Observation & Discussion

Influence Mechanism and Empirical Study of How National Centralized Drug Procurement Incentivizes Innovation Input in Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The national centralized drug procurement policy, as a key initiative in deepening China's healthcare reform, is reshaping the competitive landscape and corporate behavior of the pharmaceutical market. Using a sample of 317 listed pharmaceutical companies in China from 2015 to 2025, this study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to empirically examine the impact of the centralized drug procurement policy on the innovation investment of listed pharmaceutical companies and its underlying mechanisms. The results show that the policy significantly promotes increased innovation investment, a finding that remains robust after a series of robustness tests including parallel trend test, placebo test, variable substitution, intensity DID, and PSM-DID. Examining the mechanisms through which the policy affects innovation investment, it reallocates firm resources from sales to research by weakening marketing channels, compressing the space for non-productive expenditures, intensifying survival pressures and compelling a strategic transformation. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that the stimulating effect is more salient in larger, non-state-owned, and more mature pharmaceutical firms.

Key words

centralized drug procurement / pharmaceutical companies / innovation input / influence mechanism / empirical study

Cite this article

Download Citations
Influence Mechanism and Empirical Study of How National Centralized Drug Procurement Incentivizes Innovation Input in Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises[J]. China Health Insurance. 2026, 0(6): 44-54 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.005

References

[1] 孙菊. 探索从“仿制药大国”迈向“原研药强国”的科学路径[J].人民论坛,2024(06):66-69.
[2] 王楠,王国强.新竞争格局下中美生物医药创新对比研究[J].中国软科学,2023(01):22-31.
[3] 刘阳,任璐彤,莎如拉,等.药品集中带量采购政策在公立医院的实践成效与挑战[J].中国卫生产业,2026,23(03):187-190.
[4] 金柱,段莉敏.政策工具视角下我国药品集中采购政策实施效果研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J].现代预防医学,2026,53(03):486-491.
[5] 李寿喜,沈婷芝.我国实施药品带量采购政策效果研究——兼析对医药企业绩效与创新能力的影响[J].价格理论与实践,2020(11):49-52.
[6] 谭清立,陈依婷.药品带量采购政策的推进对我国药企的动态影响分析[J].中国卫生经济,2020,39(08):13-17.
[7] 周小又. 药品集中招标采购政策对医药企业的影响分析——以云南省为例[J].中国卫生产业,2018,26(29):29-32.
[8] 张秋玉,禄晓龙,王芸,等.药品集中带量采购政策对我国医药制造业上市企业创新绩效的影响[J].医学与社会,2022,35(12):17-23.
[9] 张新鑫,侯文华,申成霖.集中采购规制下医药企业创新激励与市场绩效研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2017,37(06):1557-1567.
[10] 唐运舒,叶徽,焦建玲,等.药品集采、以量换价与药企创新:如何实现医药减负与药企创新发展的双赢?[J].中国软科学,2023(12):123-133.
[11] 仇冰玉. 持续开展药品集采推动医药行业高质量发展[J].中国医疗保险,2022(03):17.
[12] 冯宇琦,刘利,袁曦临.行业政策影响下医药企业技术创新路径研究——来自集采中选企业的证据[J].中国科技论坛,2026(01):61-71.
[13] 宋伟,吴清锋,李钧.药品集采制度对医药企业绩效影响研究——基于PSM-DID模型[J].财会通讯,2022(16):104-108.
[14] 王俊豪,单芬霞.国家组织药品集采如何促进药企研发?[J].经济科学,2025(02):89-108.
[15] 刘斌,江承鑫.“两票制”改革能促进医药企业创新吗[J].南开管理评论,2022,25(05):54-66.
[16] 姚维保,张翼飞.研发税收优惠必然提升企业绩效吗?——基于上市医药企业面板数据的实证研究[J].税务研究,2020(07):95-101.
[17] 黄素芹,田侃,张乐君,等.带量采购政策对我国药品价格影响研究[J].价格理论与实践,2019(05):35-38.
[18] 陈文俊,彭有为,胡心怡.战略性新兴产业政策是否提升了创新绩效[J].科研管理,2020,41(01):22-34.
[19] 张永安,严嘉欣,胡佩.政府补贴对企业创新绩效的双重作用机制研究——以生物医药上市企业为例[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(01):32-39.
[20] LA FERRARA E, CHONG A, DURYEA S.Soap operas and fertility: evidence from Brazil[J]. American economic journal: applied economics,2012,4(4):1-31.
[21] SUI X N, JIAO S P, WANG Y M, et al.Digital transformation and manufacturing company competitiveness[J].Finance research letters, 2024,59:104683.
[22] 李增福,徐晓珠.地方政府债务治理如何重塑企业商业信用?[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2025,42(11):47-65.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉