Comparative Study on the Administration Models of Long-Term Care Insurance——A Case Study Based on Co-Insurance Consortium, Regional Division, and Hybrid Model

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 36-43.

China Health Insurance ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 36-43. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.004
Special Topic Analysis

Comparative Study on the Administration Models of Long-Term Care Insurance——A Case Study Based on Co-Insurance Consortium, Regional Division, and Hybrid Model

Author information +
History +

Abstract

From the perspective of principal-agent theory, Suzhou City, Chengdu City and Tianjin City were selected as the typical representatives of the long-term care insurance (LTCI) co-insurance consortium model, the regional division model and the hybrid model, respectively, to conduct a comparative case study. It is found that the three models are all the trade-offs made by the government when dealing with the problems in policy implementation, and the choice of models is a dynamic process, and there is no universal administration model. Therefore, at the national level, efforts should be made to actively promote local experimentation with administration models and to build a national repository of best practices; at the local level, regions should, based on their actual conditions, adopt models suited to their development levels and institute the mechanism for regular review and refinement.

Key words

long-term care insurance / co-insurance consortium regional / division model / hybrid model / principal-agent theory

Cite this article

Download Citations
Comparative Study on the Administration Models of Long-Term Care Insurance——A Case Study Based on Co-Insurance Consortium, Regional Division, and Hybrid Model[J]. China Health Insurance. 2026, 0(6): 36-43 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2026.6.004

References

[1] 倪锦文,陆平,高荣,等.长期护理保险制度设计研究——基于供给层面的思考[J].中国经贸导刊(理论版),2019(7):55-57.
[2] 海龙,尹海燕.我国长期护理保险筹资机制研究[J].湖南社会科学,2020(1):103-109.
[3] 付思佳,张良文,阙霜,等.长期护理保险经办管理模式及风险防控研究[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(1):23-26.
[4] 韩金,王净净.透视长期护理保险经办:试点比较与政策优化[J].东北财经大学学报,2023(2):85-97.
[5] 廖芸平. 我国长期护理保险经办模式的选择机制分析——基于16个试点城市的比较分析[D].成都:西南财经大学,2022.
[6] 郑秉文. 长期护理保险的制度定位与模式选择[J].中国医疗保险,2024(09):5-15.
[7] 但伟. 委托代理理论视角下中央财政派驻监督研究[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2023.
[8] MURWANTO R.Performance reporting by New Zealand central government agencies[D]. Wellington: Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, 2011.
[9] 黄文彦,蓝海林.委托代理关系中激励机制的设计[J].华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005(1):34-37.
[10] 白如钰. 基于委托代理理论的国企改革研究[D].延安:延安大学,2010.
[11] 国家医疗保障局.国家医疗保障局办公室关于印发《长期护理保险经办规程(试行)》的通知(2024-09-30)[2025-12-19].https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/9/30/art_104_14044.html.
[12] 盛和泰. 我国长期护理保险体系建设的运营模式选择[J].保险研究,2012(9):46-50.
[13] 武亦文. 共保协议的反垄断豁免[J].政治与法律,2024(9):20-34
[14] 王泽宇,周翔,王增文,等.乡村品牌身份重构如何助力乡村振兴?——基于贵州“村超”的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界,2025,41(03):93-113.
[15] FLYVBJERG B.Five misunderstandings about case-study research[J]. Qualitative inquiry, 2006, 12(2): 219-245.
[16] 苏州市医疗保障局.苏州市区长期护理保险宣传问答(2026-01-15)[2026-04-20].https://ybj.suzhou.gov.cn/szybj/chxi/202601/936bd897d64a467f90dda67bb1286a82.shtml.
[17] 中国政府采购网.苏州市医疗保障基金管理中心关于苏州市区(含市本级、吴中区、相城区、工业园区、高新区和姑苏区)长期护理保险经办服务项目的中标公告[EB/OL].(2025-11-13)[2026-04-20].https://www.ccgp.gov.cn/cggg/dfgg/zbgg/202511/t20251113_25687710.htm.
[18] 成都市政府采购中心.成都市医疗保障事务中心2025—2027年度成都市长期护理保险服务采购项目公开招标中标公告[EB/OL].(2025-02-20)[2025-12-20].https://ggzyjy.sc.gov.cn/019/019002/019002002/20250220/8a69f8d295047c9301951c3c7d5d3738CY.html.
[19] CAULEY J, SANDER T.Agency theory and the Chinese enterprise under reform[J]. China economic review, 1992, 3(1): 39-56.
[20] 天津市政府采购中心.天津市医疗保障基金管理中心长护险项目中标结果公告[EB/OL].(2021-04-13)[2026-04-21].http://tjgpc.zwfwb.tj.gov.cn/webInfo/getWebInfoByPkWebInfoId1.do?pkWebInfoId=6211B345-C85C-4E17-AFF7-8D0492FBCC26.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉