Objective: The paper analyzes the deep-seated obstacles faced by hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, explores the internal mechanism by which smart healthcare addresses this challenge, and constructs an operable implementation path. Methods: Using Chengdu City as a sample and moving beyond the existing "technology tool theory" perspective, the grounded theory method was applied to conduct in-depth interviews with key managers of primary healthcare institutions to systematically diagnose the deep-seated obstacles in hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, and explore the internal logic through which smart healthcare solves these problems. Results: Hierarchical diagnosis and treatment in Chengdu City faces a systemic dilemma composed of macro-level institutional failure, micro-level motivational distortion, interrupted collaborative processes, and difficulties in technology application; the breakthrough path of smart healthcare lies in following four internal logics: resource integration, collaborative cooperation, risk control, and data empowerment, which correspond respectively to restructuring spatiotemporal efficiency, reshaping incentive trust, clarifying responsibility and traceability, and driving evidence-based decision-making. Conclusion: Considering the current situation in Chengdu City, efforts should be made in four dimensions—top-level design optimization, incentive mechanism reconstruction, collaborative process assurance, and data governance deepening—to construct a new hierarchical diagnosis and treatment ecosystem driven by both technology and institutional mechanisms, providing practical references for the high-quality implementation of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment driven by smart healthcare nationwide.
Key words
graded diagnosis and treatment /
smart healthcare /
grounded theory /
collaborative governance /
Chengdu City
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 申曙光,吴庆艳.健康治理视角下的数字健康:内涵、价值及应用[J].改革,2020(12):132-144.
[2] 曹艳林,张可,易敏,等.数字时代的医疗数字化与数字医疗[J].卫生软科学,2022,36(10):80-85.
[3] 糜泽花,钱爱兵.智慧医疗发展现状及趋势研究文献综述[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(03):366-370.
[4] TIAN S, YANG W, LE GRANGE J M, et al. Smart healthcare: making medical care more intelligent[J]. Global health journal, 2019, 3(3): 62-65.
[5] BAKER S, XIANG W.Artificial intelligence of things for smarter healthcare: a survey of advancements, challenges, and opportunities[J]. IEEE communications surveys and tutorials, 2023, 25(2): 1261-1293.
[6] WANG M, GUO Y, ZHANG C, et al.MedShare: a privacy-preserving medical data sharing system by using blockchain[J]. IEEE transactions on services computing, 2023, 16(1): 438-451.
[7] 姚刚,葛帅,苏宇,等.公立医院互联网医院服务体系建设探索与思考[J].中国医院,2022,26(01):6-8.
[8] 焦岳龙,左克强,陈震,等.门诊全流程智慧医疗体系建设实践与探索[J].中国医院管理,2021,41(05):39-42.
[9] 杨叶,张娟,陈皓阳,等.我国互联网医疗政策执行困境及优化策略——基于政策网络理论[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(08):14-17.
[10] 郑英,李力,代涛.我国部分地区分级诊疗政策实践的比较分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2016,9(04):1-8.
[11] 黄严,张璐莹.激励相容:中国“分级诊疗”的实现路径——基于S县医共体改革的个案研究[J].中国行政管理,2019(07):115-123.
[12] GAO M, ZHU X.Rural residents' willingness to utilize primary care and its influencing factors in the context of graded diagnosis and treatment: a study in Deqing, China[J]. Frontiers in public health, 2024, 12(1478686).
[13] 刘广伟,王琛,王浩,等.常态化5G远程超声服务模式在乡镇卫生院的应用实践探讨[J].中国医疗管理科学,2022,12(02):40-43.
[14] 林辉,董津.互联网+医联体助力分级诊疗落地[J].中国医院,2017,21(05):52-53.
[15] 郭晨,李刚,何宇.大数据时代下分级诊疗制度设计:基于医疗资源优化配置的博弈分析[J].中国卫生经济,2018,37(05):22-25.
[16] 孔维鹏,刘海鹏,梁立科,等.基于人工智能的儿科分级诊疗新模式构建[J].中国医院管理,2022,42(02):91-93.