The financial status of the basic medical insurance fund for urban and rural residents (hereinafter referred to as the resident medical insurance fund) depends on the size of the fund's income and expenditure, and is affected by factors such as coverage, financing standards, and benefits. How do these factors affect the sustainable operation of the residents' medical insurance fund? In this paper, the actuarial model is used to find that if the coverage and benefits of 2020 remains unchanged, the resident medical insurance fund will have a cumulative deficit in 2036, which cannot achieve long-term sustainable operation, and the cumulative deficit by 2050 will be 9953.525 billion yuan, and there will be a large fund deficit. The expansion of coverage will affect the fund income and expenditure, but will not change the node where the fund has current deficit and cumulative deficit. Whether universal coverage will be achieved in 2035 or in 2050, the point at which the fund starts to run current and cumulative deficits is 2026 and 2036, respectively. To achieve universal medical insurance by 2050, the cumulative deficit will be 412.368 billion yuan more than the participation rate will remain unchanged. It can be seen that the expansion of coverage is not conducive to the sustainable operation of residents' medical insurance funds. When the cumulative deficit occurs in the baseline scenario, if only the individual contribution amount makes up the deficit, the individual contribution amount will increase to 3249.87 yuan in 2050, and the ratio between the government subsidy amount and the individual contribution amount is 0.89, and if the deficit is covered by government subsidies, the cumulative additional subsidies will reach 9953.525 billion yuan. If the outpatient insurance benefits are reduced to reduce the fund expenditure, even if the reimbursement ratio of outpatient expenses is reduced to 0, the resident medical insurance fund will still show a cumulative deficit in 2049. If the hospitalization insurance benefits are reduced to reduce the fund expenditure, when the actual reimbursement ratio of hospitalization expenses is reduced to 49.4% at least, the accumulated deficit of the medical insurance fund will not appear in 2050. If the outpatient and inpatient insurance benefits are reduced at the same time, the combination of the minimum reimbursement ratio of outpatient and inpatient expenses reducing to 41.1% and 51.1%, respectively, can prevent the cumulative deficit in 2050 and realize the long-term stable operation of the medical insurance fund.
Key words
basic medical insurance fund for urban and rural residents /
insurance participation rate /
the amount paid /
medical insurance benefits
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 郑功成.中国医疗保障基金:政策演进、实践评估与可持续发展[J].江淮论坛,2022(5):5-14+2.
[2] 王贞,封进,刘一恒.门诊待遇非线性定价与住院率——来自城乡居民基本医保的证据[J].经济研究,2023,58(12):132-149.
[3] 吴君槐,张丽萍.城乡居民医保整合背景下基于GM(1,1)模型的基金预测研究[J].中国集体经济,2022(26):103-107.
[4] 黄小君,金新政,叶云,等.省级统筹政策视角下医保基金运行预测研究[J].卫生软科学,2023,37(6):75-80.
[5] 王微.贵州省城乡居民医保基金可持续运行能力提升研究[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2023,43(2):119-125.
[6] 刘军强,刘凯,曾益.医疗费用持续增长机制——基于历史数据和田野资料的分析[J].中国社会科学,2015(8):104-125+206-207.
[7] 周晨亮.市级统筹模式下城乡居民医保支出可持续研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2022.
[8] 林韦然.P市城乡居民医保基金可持续运行风险管理研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2022.
[9] 华颖.居民基本医疗保险:筹资政策、实践效应及其优化[J].长白学刊,2023(2):128-138.
[10] 朱坤.保障适度量化下的基本医保筹资需求分析[J].中国医疗保险,2021(4):31-36.
[11] 施文凯,朱坤.中国医疗保障财政支出:现状、问题与对策[J].财政科学,2022(10):72-81.
[12] 于凌云,于梦迪.城乡居民医保基金运行效率及其影响因素研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2021,14(10):31-37.
[13] 朱铭来,申宇鹏.大病保险如何影响城乡居民医保基金可持续性——基于“十四五”期间大病保险若干保障方案的实证分析[J].社会保障研究,2022(5):26-41.
[14] 张立强,朱铭,李响,等.健全稳健可持续筹资运行机制的思考[J].中国医疗保险,2023(7):5-13.
[15] 蔡雪妮,王震.城乡居民医保待遇调整对基金支出的影响分析——基于浙江某市的调查[J].中国医疗保险,2018(2):31-34.
[16] 蔡滨,周罗晶,毛向阳,等.江苏省城乡居民基本医疗保险制度高质量发展路径探讨[J].中国医院,2022,26(6):26-28.
[17] 张小娟,周德水.基本医保参保人门诊医疗服务利用、费用及风险分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2023,16(1):36-41.
[18] 叶倩莉.人口结构变动对基本医疗保险基金支出的影响分析[D].南昌:江西财经大学,2023.
[19] 李阳,熊林平,段光锋.上海市户籍人口基本医疗保险参保人口预测分析[J].中国社会医学杂志,2023,40(4):492-496.
[20] 文云霞,贾娟.提升居民医保基金运行效能的路径——以某市2022年城乡居民基本医疗保险基金运行为例[J].山西财税,2023(10):56-57.
[21] 曾益,林燚阳.新业态从业人员养老保险的参保选择:缴费指数和缴费年限越高越好吗?——基于基金可持续和养老金替代率的视角[J].上海财经大学学报,2023,25(6):73-87.
[22] 曾益,李姝,张冉,等.门诊共济改革、渐进式延迟退休年龄与职工医保基金可持续性——基于多种方案的模拟分析[J].保险研究,2021(4):91-105.