Analysis and Discussion of Guideline for Preparing Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (2022 Edition)

China Health Insurance ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 121-126.

China Health Insurance ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6) : 121-126. DOI: 10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2023.6.019
International( Region) Comparison

Analysis and Discussion of Guideline for Preparing Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (2022 Edition)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The paper analyzes the contents of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (2022 Edition), draws lessons from it and puts forward proposals. Method: A comparative study was used to analyze the differences between the current guidelines in China and the economic evaluation guidelines in Japan. Result: Some contents of the Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (2022 Edition) are worth considering during the current medical insurance evaluation in China. Conclusion: Medical economic evaluation guidelines are of great significance to the development of China's medical insurance industry. It is suggested that relevant departments issue guidelines for the evaluation of medical insurance, and establish a Chinese characteristic medical insurance evaluation system with higher integration, better coordination, stronger professionalism, and better meeting the actual conditions of China.

Key words

Japan / health insurance / economic evaluation / guide / suggestions

Cite this article

Download Citations
Analysis and Discussion of Guideline for Preparing Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (2022 Edition)[J]. China Health Insurance. 2023, 0(6): 121-126 https://doi.org/10.19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2023.6.019

References

[1] 刘国恩,胡善联,吴久鸿,等.中国药物经济学评价指南[M].中国市场出版社,2020.
[2] SHIROIWA T, FUKUDA T, IKEDA S, et al.Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan[J]. Value in Health the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2017,20(3):372.
[3] 中央社会保険医療協議会における費用対効果評価の分析ガイドライン第3版[EB/OL]. (2022-02-09)[2023-04-12].https://c2h.niph.go.jp/en/tools/guideline/index.html.
[4] Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health,C2H[EB/OL].(2022-02-09)[2023-4-12].https://c2h.niph.go.jp/en/results/item.html.
[5] HASEGAWA M, KOMOTO S, SHIROIWA T, et al.Formal Implementation of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan: AUnique Health Technology Assessment System[J].Value in Health, 2020,23(1):43-51.
[6] ISPOR. Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around the World[EB/OL].[2023-04-12].http://www.ispor.org/PEguidelines/index.asp.
[7] 何旭, 张方.亚洲药物经济学评价指南研究及对中国的启示[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2015,24(19):6.
[8] MHLW. Full Scale Introduction of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan[EB/OL].[2023-04-12].https://c2h.niph.go.jp/en/assessment/cost-effectiveness/index.html.
[9] YAMAMOTO M, CURLEY J, HIRATA H.Trends in Open vs. Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comprehensive Survey in Japan[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022,11(17):4966.
[10] 周沛宇,席晓宇.生产率损失测量工具的比较研究[J].中国卫生资源, 2022,25(5):7.
[11] STIG, EVENSEN, TORBJøRN, et al. Prevalence, Employment Rate, and Cost of Schizophrenia in a High-Income Welfare Society: A Population-Based Study Using Comprehensive Health and Welfare Registers[J]. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2015.
[12] LUENGO-FERNANDEZ R, LEAL J, GRAY A, et al.Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis.[J].Lancet Oncology, 2013,14(12):1165-1174.
[13] KAMAE I, THWAITES R, HAMADA A, et al.Health technology assessment in Japan: a work in progress[J]. Journal of Medical Economics.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/